Hermanus Daniel Van Der Westhuizen, his wife Maria, and his three children, Hermanus, Jacolize, and Fourie, petition this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying relief on their application for asylum and withholding of removal. The Van Der Westhuizens have not briefed the BIA’s denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture, and that claim is deemed abandoned. See Rodriguez v. INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414 n. 15 (5th Cir. 1993); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

As to the asylum application, the Van Der Westhuizens challenge the BIA’s determination that their application was untimely under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2). This court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s *94 determination that the asylum application was untimely. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3).

The Van Der Westhuizens argue that the BIA erred in denying their application for withholding of removal. The BIA’s determination is supported by substantial evidence, and the record does not compel a conclusion contrary to the BIA’s finding that the Van Der Westhuizens have not met their burden to establish an entitlement to withholding of removal. See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002); 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b).

The petition for review is DENIED.