Hector Manuel Villa appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. Villa contends that he was sentenced in violation of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), when his sentence was enhanced for possession of a dangerous weapon and his role in the offense. Villa also contends that his sentence is unconstitutional because he was sentenced pursuant to the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime.

The district court, however, opined that if the Guidelines were held unconstitutional, it would impose the same sentence. Therefore, the Government has carried its burden of establishing that the sentencing errors suffered by Villa were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 464 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Akpan, 407 F.3d 360, 376 (5th Cir. 2005); see also United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 411 F.3d 597, 601 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, S.Ct. (Oct. 11, 2005) (No. 05-6242).

AFFIRMED.