U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2005

United States v. McKinney

United States v. McKinney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 14, 2005 · King, Higginbotham, Smith
158 F. App'x 583

United States v. McKinney

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Marcus Dewayne McKinney has filed a motion to withdraw and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). McKinney has not filed a response. Our independent review of the briefs and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.