Rigoberto Jaimes appeals his conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841. He argues that in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the district court erred in sentenc *732 ing him under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines. Jaimes has not shown, and the record does not support the contention, that had the guidelines been advisory, the court would have imposed a lesser sentence. See e.g., United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert, filed (July 25, 2005)(No. 05-5556); United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 411 F.3d 597, 601 (5th Cir. 2005). Thus, he has failed to show plain error in his sentence. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517).

AFFIRMED.