U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Durham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 5, 2005 · Higginbotham, Benavides, Dennis

156 F. App'x 662

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel for Terrick Durham moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California. 1 Durham did not file a response. After review of counsel’s brief and of the record, we conclude that no nonfrivolous issues remain for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 2

Pursuant to the 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.