Lorenzo Cotton appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. Challenging the denial of his motion to suppress, he argues that (1) the search warrant was supported by only a “bare bones” affidavit, precluding application of the good-faith exception to the probable cause requirement, and (2) exigent circumstances faded to excuse the officers’ failure to knock and announce when executing the warrant.

We hold that the affidavit in this case, nearly identical in all pertinent respects to the affidavit at issue in United States v. McKnight, 953 F.2d 898, 904-05 (5th Cir. 1992), was not a “bare bones” affidavit or facially invalid. Therefore, the good-faith exception to the warrant requirement is applicable, and we need not reach the issue whether the warrant was in fact supported by probable cause. United States v. Davis, 226 F.3d 346, 351 (5th Cir. 2000).

We further hold that the officers’ failure to knock and announce was reasonable and therefore not violative of the Fourth Amendment based on the following nonexclusive list of exigent circumstances: (1) Cotton had several prior arrests for violent crimes; (2) there was evidence that he had fought with police on one occasion; (3) there was reliable information that he carried a firearm; (4) he was on state parole; and (5) there was a risk of evidence destruction. See United States v. Washington, 340 F.3d 222, 227 (5th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.