United States v. Escobar-Mendoza
United States v. Escobar-Mendoza
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40390 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NELSON WILFREDO ESCOBAR-MENDOZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-939-ALL --------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Nelson Wilfredo Escobar-Mendoza pleaded guilty to one count
of reentering the United States without permission after having
been deported. Escobar’s constitutional challenge to
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235(1998). Although Escobar contends that
Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of
the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of
Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466(2000), we have repeatedly
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-40390 -2-
rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres
remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez,
410 F.3d 268, 276(5th Cir.), cert. denied,
126 S. Ct. 298(2005). Escobar
properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of
Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to
preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished