United States v. Medellin
United States v. Medellin
Opinion of the Court
Counsel appointed to represent Danny Medellin on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed both an original and supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Medellin has filed a pro se response. Our independent review of counsel’s briefs, Medellin’s pro se response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.