Jones v. Dretke
Jones v. Dretke
Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
This court affirmed the denial of Anzel Jones’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. Jones v. Cockrell, 74 Fed.Appx. 317 (5th Cir. 2003). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Roper v. Simmons, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005). Jones v. Dretke, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1588, 161 L.Ed.2d 270 (2005). We requested and received supplemental letter
All the issues addressed in our prior opinion are in regard only to the sentence of death. Because Jones no longer faces a death sentence, those issues are now moot. The appeal, accordingly, is DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.