U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Arias-Setina

United States v. Arias-Setina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 9, 2005 · Benavides, Garza, Reavley
147 F. App'x 420

United States v. Arias-Setina

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, David Arias-Setina raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal *421offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.