U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Rush

United States v. Rush
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 14, 2005 · Higginbotham, King, Smith
158 F. App'x 589

United States v. Rush

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Daniel J. Rush has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rush was informed of counsel’s motion but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.