Manuel Torres-Rodriguez (Torres) appeals the sentence he received when his term of supervised release, which was imposed when he pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, was revoked. Torres argues that the district court failed to articulate whether it considered the policy statement’s advisory range of imprisonment before it sentenced *389 him to the 24-month statutory maximum sentence.

Torres concedes that our review is for plain error because he did not raise this claim in the district court. See United States v. Montez, 952 F.2d 854, 860 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court was advised of the advisory range through the probation officer’s Violation Conduct Computation form. Even if the district court failed to consider this information, which the record does not suggest, Torres has nevertheless failed to show that the purported error affected his substantial rights inasmuch as the district court retained discretion and detailed his rationale for imposing the 24-month sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); Ayers, 946 F.2d at 1130.

AFFIRMED.