United States v. Cobb
Opinion
A jury found that Dawn Marie Cobb and *486 Kenneth Ryan Hamann, aided and abetted by each other, possessed equipment, chemicals, products and materials used to manufacture methamphetamine and opened, used, and maintained a place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, and using methamphetamine. A jury also found that Harmann attempted to manufacture methamphetamine. Both Cobb and Harmann challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting their convictions, having adequately preserved their challenge in district court. See United States v. Resio-Trejo, 45 F.3d 907, 911 n. 6 (5th Cir. 1995)
Viewing the evidence produced at trial in the light most favorable to the verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could have found that the evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt Cobb’s and Hamann’s guilt as to each of the charged offenses. See United States v. Villarreal, 324 F.3d 319, 322 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dawn Marie COBB, Kenneth Ryan Hamann, Defendants-Appellants
- Status
- Unpublished