United States v. Mullins
United States v. Mullins
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 6, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-61173 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RONDALL MULLINS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:02-CR-60-MPM-ALL --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rondall Mullins appeals the district court’s revocation of his
supervised release and imposition of a term of imprisonment. See
18 U.S.C. § 3583(g). He argues that the district court erred in
not imposing substance-abuse treatment pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §3583(d) in lieu of incarceration. Mullins committed several
violations of the conditions of his supervised release. Failure of
a drug test was but one of those violations. Moreover, the
district court considered but rejected the available treatment
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-61173 -2-
options. See
18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). Accordingly, there was no error
in the district court’s revocation of supervised release and
imposition of a term of imprisonment.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished