Jesse L. Cage, federal prisoner #22766-034, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence challenging his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride. The district court granted Cage a certificate of appealability on the issue of whether his counsel was ineffective for not seeking to suppress wiretap evidence on the ground that the wiretap *884 authorization violated state law, thereby preserving the issue for appeal. Cage argues that he is entitled to relief on this issue because his counsel should have spotted the issue and because the result of his trial would have been different if the wiretap evidence had been suppressed.

In the appeal from the denial of the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Cage’s co-defendant, Calvin Brown, Jr., this court addressed the same issue that is raised in this case. See United States v. Brown, 111 Fed. Appx. 269, 270-72 (5th Cir. 2004) (unpublished). For the reasons set forth in that decision, Cage has not shown that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. See id. at 271-72.

AFFIRMED.