United States v. Rangel-Reyes
United States v. Rangel-Reyes
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40256 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN RANGEL-REYES,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-80-1 --------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Juan Rangel-Reyes (Rangel) appeals his conviction and
sentence for illegal reentry, raising a constitutional challenge
to
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2). We do not reach the
applicability of the sentencing waiver because Rangel’s
constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.
United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235(1998). Although Rangel
contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that
a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres
in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466(2000), we have
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-40256 -2-
repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-
Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez,
410 F.3d 268, 276(5th Cir.), cert. denied,
126 S. Ct. 298(2005).
Rangel properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light
of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here
to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished