United States v. Rangel-Reyes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Rangel-Reyes, 169 F. App'x 198 (5th Cir. 2006)

United States v. Rangel-Reyes

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40256 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN RANGEL-REYES,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-80-1 --------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Rangel-Reyes (Rangel) appeals his conviction and

sentence for illegal reentry, raising a constitutional challenge

to

8 U.S.C. § 1326

(b)(1) and (2). We do not reach the

applicability of the sentencing waiver because Rangel’s

constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998). Although Rangel

contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that

a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres

in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466

(2000), we have

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-40256 -2-

repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-

Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez,

410 F.3d 268, 276

(5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 298

(2005).

Rangel properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light

of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here

to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished