U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Rodriguez-Mercado

United States v. Rodriguez-Mercado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 23, 2006
169 F. App'x 211

United States v. Rodriguez-Mercado

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40372 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ-MERCADO, also known as Miguel Villafranco-Ponce, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-973-ALL -------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Miguel Rodriguez-Mercado appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien unlawfully found in the United States after deportation, having previously been convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b).

Rodriguez-Mercado challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998).

Although Rodriguez-Mercado contends that Almendarez-Torres was * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 05-40372 -2- incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Rodriguez-Mercado properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.