United States v. Avalos-Cortez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Avalos-Cortez, 169 F. App'x 354 (5th Cir. 2006)

United States v. Avalos-Cortez

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40733 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RIGOBERTO AVALOS-CORTEZ, also known as Rigoberto Cortez-Avalos,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-38-ALL --------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rigoberto Avalos-Cortez appeals his conviction and sentence

for illegal reentry after a previous deportation. Avalos-

Cortez’s constitutional challenge to

8 U.S.C. § 1326

(b) is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998). Although Avalos-Cortez contends that

Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of

the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466

(2000), we have repeatedly

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-40733 -2-

rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres

remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez,

410 F.3d 268, 276

(5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 298

(2005). Avalos-

Cortez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light

of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here

to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished