United States v. Morales
United States v. Morales
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40807 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ISIDRO GABRIEL MORALES,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-1006-ALL --------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Isidro Gabriel Morales appeals his sentence under
8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) for illegal reentry into the United States
after having been deported following conviction for an aggravated
felony. Morales asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated
felony” provisions of
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are facially
unconstitutional.
The constitutional issue raised is foreclosed by Almendarez-
Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235(1998). Although
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-40807 -2-
Morales contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided
and that majority of the Supreme Court would overrule it in light
of Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466(2000), we have
repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-
Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez,
410 F.3d 268, 276(5th Cir.), cert. denied,
126 S. Ct. 298(2005).
Morales properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in
light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises
it here to preserve it for further review.
The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished