U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Hampton

United States v. Hampton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 12, 2006 · Davis, Jolly, Jones, Per Curiam
177 F. App'x 402

United States v. Hampton

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Kenneth Allen Hampton raises argu *403 ments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 8, 2006) (No. 05-9633), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.