The attorney appointed to represent Cayetano Gonzalez-Valverde has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gonzalez-Valverde filed a motion to remand, which we treat as an untimely response to the Anders brief. Our independent review of the brief, the record, and Gonzalez-Valverde’s untimely response discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is dismissed. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Gonzalez-Valverde’s separate motion seeking appointment of counsel on appeal is denied as Gonzalez-Valverde has not demonstrated incompatibility with his counsel or other most pressing circumstances. See Fifth Circuit Plan under the Criminal Justice Act, § 5; see also United States v. Route, 104 F.3d 59, 65 (5th Cir. 1997).

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.