*687 Ben Lane appeals his conviction following a jury trial for conspiracy to obstruct interstate commerce; aiding and abetting in the obstruction of interstate commerce; and possession of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. First, he asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. We reject this assertion, as Lane has failed to show that a reasonable jury could not have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Sanchez, 961 F.2d 1169, 1173 (5th Cir. 1992). We find unpersuasive his arguments that (1) a firearm discovered by police did not link him to the crime and that (2) certain witnesses were not credible. See id.

Likewise, we reject Lane’s assertion that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence based upon facts that were not determined by the jury. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 43, 163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.