United States v. Coble
United States v. Coble
Opinion
The attorney appointed to represent Warren Douglass Coble, Jr., on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Coble has responded to counsel’s motion, arguing that the sentencing court erred in sentencing him for possession of crack cocaine as opposed to some other form of cocaine base. Our independent review of the brief, Coble’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.