Raul Wong-Rodriguez appeals from his conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. Wong-Rodriguez challenges his sentence, raising several arguments that are barred by the appeal-waiver provision of his plea agreement. See United States v. Burns, 433 F.3d 442, 450-51 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005). Wong-Rodriguez contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in several respects, but the record is not sufficiently developed for us to address any of those ineffective-assistance contentions. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). Finally, Wong-Rodriguez contends that his indictment was duplicitous, and he raises a claim based on a typographical error in counts of the indictment to which he did not plead guilty. Wong-Rodriguez’s guilty plea waived his non-jurisdictional contentions regarding his indictment. See United States v. Lampazianie, 251 F.3d 519, 526 (5th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED.