Yolanda Paredes-Ramirez, a citizen of Mexico, petitions this court for review of an order pretermitting her application for adjustment of status to that of lawful permanent resident and ordering her removal to Mexico. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed the order of the immigration judge (IJ).

Paredes-Ramirez argues that the BIA erred by determining that she was not eligible for adjustment of status and that the IJ erred by failing to properly adjudicate her application for permission to reapply for admission. Because Paredes-Ramirez was inadmissible pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I), the BIA did not act arbitrarily when it determined that Paredes-Ramirez was not eligible for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i)(1)(A)(i). Mortera-Cruz v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 246, 255-56 (5th Cir. 2005). Because Paredes-Ramirez did not challenge the adjudication of her application for permission to reapply for admission when she was before the BIA, that issue is not cognizable in this court. Roy v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004). Even if we were to review that claim, Paredes-Ramirez would not be entitled to relief because she has failed to make an initial showing of substantial prejudice. Anwar v. INS, 116 F.3d 140, 144 (5th Cir. 1997).

Paredes-Ramirez’s petition for review is DENIED.