Jobi Kurian Kadavil, a citizen of India, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals that affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order of removal. Kadavil contends that the IJ erred by denying his final motion for a continuance so that he could pursue a T-l visa application because he was a victim of a severe form of human trafficking.

*303 Our review is for abuse of discretion, see Manzano-Garcia v. Gonzales, 413 F.3d 462, 466 (5th Cir. 2005), and we find no abuse of discretion in Kadavil’s case. First, the IJ had previously granted Kadavil one continuance to pursue a nonimmigrant worker application and two continuances to pursue his T-1 application. Second, the evidence indicated that the T-1 application would be denied initially. Third, Kadavil did not present the documentation needed to support his T-1 application, see 8 CFR § 211.1(a), and the evidence in the record did not indicate when, or even whether, the T-1 application would be supplemented. The IJ gave Kadavil ample time to pursue relief, yet Kadavil did not demonstrate that he had submitted a T-1 application that would be seriously considered.

PETITION DENIED.