United States v. Espinoza-Urrutia
United States v. Espinoza-Urrutia
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-11217 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUIS ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA-URRUTIA, also known as Luis Alejandr Espinoza-Urrutia, also known as Luis Uriostegui, also known as Luis Bustmant Uriostegui, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-13-ALL -------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Alejandro Espinoza-Urrutia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.