Pedro Armenta-Valentin (Armenta) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation, pursuant to a plea agreement that contained a waiver-of-appeal provision. We need not decide the applicability of the waiver provision in this case because the issue that Armenta raises is foreclosed.

Armenta argues that the district court erred by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct appeal. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). The appeal is DISMISSED.