Jorge Rios-Joaquina (Rios) appeals the 60-month sentence that he received after he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry by a deported alien. Rios argues that the district court violated his due process rights when it upwardly departed without stating on the record that aggravating or mitigating circumstances were present that had not been considered by the Sentencing Commission when it formulated the Guidelines. Rios argues, alternatively, that if United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), applies, the upward departure was unreasonable.

Rios fails to meet his burden of showing that the district court’s post Booker, non-guidelines sentence, which was an upward deviation from the guidelines range of imprisonment, was error, plain or otherwise. See United States v. Jones, 444 F.3d 430, 434-36 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 707-10 (5th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.