United States v. Zuniga-Enriquez
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41784 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LORENZO ZUNIGA-ENRIQUEZ, also known as Florencio Zuniga- Enriquez, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-429-ALL -------------------- Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Lorenzo Zuniga-Enriquez (Zuniga) appeals his illegal reentry conviction and sentence, challenging the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2). Zuniga’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Zuniga contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such No. 05-41784 -2- arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.
See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Zuniga properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.