Jose Tepezano-Avila (Tepezano), federal prisoner # 85628-080, appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, wherein he argued that Amendment 668 to the Sentencing Guidelines should be applied to the calculation of his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(a)(3).

Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines may not be applied retroactively upon a motion under § 3582(c)(2) unless they are specifically set forth in U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(c). See U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(a), p.s. (Nov. 2005). Amendment 668 is not fisted in § lB1.10(c) and therefore may not be applied retroactively under Tepezano’s motion. See United States v. Drath, 89 F.3d 216, 218 (5th Cir.l996)(amendment not listed in § lB1.10(c) “cannot be given retroactive effect in the context of a § 3582(c)(2) motion”). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Tepezano’s § 3582(c)(2) motion.

AFFIRMED.