U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Rivas-Rosas

United States v. Rivas-Rosas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 14, 2006 · Davis, Barksdale, Demoss
189 F. App'x 337

United States v. Rivas-Rosas

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Lucio Rivas-Rosas raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *338 the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.