Lauro Javier Portillo-Vela pleaded guilty to reentering the United States illegally after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Portillo-Vela now appeals his sentence, arguing that the district *355 court erred in enhancing his sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 because his prior sexual assault conviction under Tex. Penal Code § 22.011(b)(4) did not constitute a crime of violence. Because we agree that Portillo-Vela’s prior conviction did not constitute a crime of violence, we VACATE and REMAND.

The Sentencing Guidelines provide for a sixteen-level upward adjustment for an illegal-entry defendant with a prior conviction for a crime of violence. U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). An offense qualifies as a crime of violence if it includes an element of force or constitutes an enumerated offense. Id. cmt. (n.1(B)(iii)).

In United States v. Luciano-Rodriguez, 442 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2006), reh’g en banc denied, 2006 WL 2235104 (5th Cir. Aug.3, 2006), we held that because Tex. Penal Code § 22.011(a)(1) defines sexual assault to include those offenses, such as here, where “assent is rendered a legal nullity by the statute,” a conviction under § 22.011(a)(1) is not a forcible sex offense and thus not a crime of violence. Luciano-Rodriguez, 442 F.3d at 322; see also United States v. Sarmiento-Funes, 374 F.3d 336 (5th Cir. 2004). Because we find no distinction between this case and Luciano-Rodriguez, we conclude that PortilloVela’s prior conviction did not constitute a crime of violence.

Therefore, we VACATE Portillo-Vela’s sentence and REMAND to the district court for resentencing.