Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Sanchez-Perez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Nava-Perez, 242 F.3d 277, 279 (5th Cir. 2001), which held that an alien’s removal, on reinstatement of a prior order of removal, was a separate and distinct event from his original removal, such that the alien had been removed subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction, and by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.