Sharon Forman appeals the district court’s order dismissing her sexual harassment claim against Southern Motion, Inc., brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2003 & Supp. 2006), as well as her state law claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent retention, and negligent supervision. After reviewing the briefs and pertinent record excerpts and considering the oral arguments of the parties, the court concludes that the district court did not err in deciding that Forman’s evidence did not create a genuine issue of material fact as to either a quid pro quo *380 claim or a hostile work environment claim under Title VII. Further, the district court did not err in granting summary judgment on Forman’s state law claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent retention, and negligent hiring. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.