U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Drew

United States v. Drew
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 5, 2006 · Jones, Per Curiam, Smith, Stewart
202 F. App'x 49

United States v. Drew

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Chris Richard Drew raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. McCarty, 36 F.3d 1349, 1361 (5th Cir. 1994), which held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar punishments under both 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c) and 2113(a) and (d). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.