U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Sandoval-Vallejo

United States v. Sandoval-Vallejo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 5, 2006 · Jones, Per Curiam, Smith, Stewart
202 F. App'x 37

United States v. Sandoval-Vallejo

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo Sandoval-Vallejo raises ar *38 guments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691, 694 (5th Cir. 1997), which held that a Texas felony conviction for possession of marijuana was an “aggravated felony” under § 2L1.2(b) of the Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *38 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.