Albion A. Norman, Jr., was convicted of wire fraud, transportation of stolen property, engaging in illegal monetary transactions, and money laundering. He was sentenced to a 109-month term of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Norman now appeals the 12-month term of imprisonment imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Norman argues that the district court reversibly erred because the circumstances *583 of his ease do not warrant the term of imprisonment imposed in his ease.

Although the 12-month term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of Norman’s supervised release exceeded the sentencing range indicated by the policy statements in Chapter Seven of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, it was less than the statutory maximum term of imprisonment that the district court could have imposed. See 18 U.S.C. § 8583(e)(3). Accordingly, Norman’s sentence upon revocation was neither “unreasonable” nor “plainly unreasonable.” See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1804, 164 L.Ed.2d 540 (2006). Norman has not shown error.

AFFIRMED.