Albert Henson, Jr., pleaded guilty to bank fraud and now appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Henson argues that the district court’s imposition of the statutory maximum term of imprisonment was erroneous because it exceeded the advisory policy range set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(a)(2).

We need not decide whether the “plainly unreasonable” standard continues to apply to sentences imposed upon revocation of supervised release or whether, post-Booker, ** the “unreasonableness” standard governs, or even if there is a difference between the two standards; Henson’s sentence passes muster under either and was not imposed in violation of law. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1804, 164 L.Ed.2d 540 (2006).

AFFIRMED.