United States v. Schmidt
United States v. Schmidt
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-11237 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ADAM SCHMIDT, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-89-ALL -------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adam Schmidt has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Schmidt has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.