Billy Joe Burns was convicted of possession with intent to distribute less than 50 kilograms of marijuana; he was sentenced to 27 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Burns now appeals the two-year term of imprisonment imposed following the revocation of his term of supervised release. He argues that the sentence imposed exceeds the maximum allowed by statute.

At issue is whether the felony classification of the underlying offense, which ultimately determines the maximum term of imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release, is determined by the Guidelines range calculated by the district court for the underlying offense or by the statute. We recently held that the appropriate classification is determined by the statutory section defining the offense. See United States v. Alfaro-Hernandez, 453 F.3d 280, 282 (5th Cir. 2006).

Burns was convicted of possession with intent to distribute less than 50 kilograms of marijuana, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(D). Section 841(b)(1)(D) provides that, for cases involving less than 50 kilograms of marijuana, the defendant shall “be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 5 years.” An offense having a maximum term of imprisonment of “less than ten years but five or more years” is a “Class D” felony. 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(4). For Class D felonies, the maximum term of imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release is two years. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Burns was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 24 months, which *803 is “within the statutorily acceptable range.” Alfaro-Hernandez, 453 F.3d at 282.

AFFIRMED.