Defendant-Appellant Jesus Galindo-Saucedo appeals his 212-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine. Galindo argues that his sentence should be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing before a different judge because the government breached the plea agreement by failing to recommend a sentence at the low end of the applicable guideline range at the sentencing hearing.

Under the terms of the plea agreement, the government was required to recommend that Galindo receive a sentence at the low end of the applicable Guideline range if Galindo complied “fully with all the terms of this plea agreement, specifically including his successful efforts to earn a substantial assistance downward departure as set out herein.” Galindo did not successfully earn a substantial-assistance downward departure as plainly required under the terms of the plea agreement, and he conceded as much at sentencing. Thus, the government’s failure to make the recommenda *471 tion was not error, plain or otherwise. See United States v. Reeves, 255 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 2001); United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993).

AFFIRMED.