Kenneth James Jendrzey pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition and was sentenced to 78 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Jendrzey appeals his conviction, arguing that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional because it does not require a substantial effect on interstate commerce. Alternatively, he contends that evidence of mere movement of the ammunition across state lines is insufficient to establish a substantial effect on interstate commerce. Jendrzey concedes that his arguments are foreclosed, but he raises them to preserve additional review.

The “constitutionality of § 922(g) is not open to question.” United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 517 (5th Cir. 2001). Evidence that a firearm or ammunition has traveled in interstate commerce at some point in the past is sufficient to support a conviction under § 922(g), even if the defendant possessed the firearm or ammunition entirely intrastate. United States v. Lee, 310 F.3d 787, 788-89 (5th Cir. 2002); United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.