United States v. Coronado
United States v. Coronado
Opinion
Felipe Coronado appeals his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Because Coronado entered an unconditional guilty plea, he waived all nonjurisdictional defects. Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973). Accordingly, he waived the right to challenge the district court’s order striking his motion to suppress, see United States v. Wise, 179 F.3d 184, 186 (5th Cir. 1999), and any denial of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel that is unrelated to the validity of his guilty plea. See United States v. Glinsey, 209 F.3d 386, 392 (5th Cir. 2000). The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to review Coronado’s claim that the alleged Sixth Amendment deprivation affected the validity of his guilty plea. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.