Amanda Ochoa appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine. She argues that the district court clearly erred by not granting her a reduction in her offense level for being a minor or minimal participant under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because she was merely a drug courier.

*817 Following United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), we continue to review “a district court’s interpretation and application of the Guidelines in the same manner as we did pre-Booker.” United States v. Ville-gas, 404 F.3d 355, 362 n. 7 (5th Cir. 2005). A district court’s determination of a defendant’s role in the offense is a factual finding that we review for clear error. United States v. Deavours, 219 F.3d 400, 404 (5th Cir. 2000).

Ochoa admitted that she and her co-defendant were to receive a substantial amount of money for transporting a large quantity of drugs. Under these circumstances, the district court did not clearly err by refusing to grant Ochoa a reduction as a minor or minimal participant. See United States v. Leal-Mendoza, 281 F.3d 473, 477 (5th Cir. 2002).

AFFIRMED.