Maria Felicitas Cruz De Gomez (Gomez) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) decision denying adjustment of status. We hold that substantial evidence does not compel a reversal of the immigration judge’s finding that Gomez did not enter the United States under advance parole and was therefore statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status. See Majd v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 590, 594 (5th Cir. 2006); Mortera-Cruz v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 246, 249, 256 (5th Cir. 2005). We further hold that under the circumstances of her case, it was not unreasonable for the immigration judge to require Gomez to provide evidence corroborating her testimony that she had entered the United States under advance parole. Cf. Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 295, 304 (5th Cir. 2005).

Finally, Gomez’s untimely request to toll or stay the period of voluntary departure is refused. Cf. Bocova v. Gonzales, 412 F.3d 257, 266, 268 (1st Cir. 2005); Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION DENIED.