Syed Abid Ali petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Ap *843 peals (BIA). The BIA affirmed without opinion the immigration judge’s (“U”) order of removal. For the reasons that follow, the petition for review is denied.

Ali challenges the denial of his motion for a continuance. The IJ determined that Ali’s wife’s pending application for labor certification did not constitute good cause to continue the removal proceedings. This determination was not an abuse of discretion. See Ahmed v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 433, 438-39 (5th Cir. 2006).

There is no merit to Ali’s challenge to the constitutionality of the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System. See id. at 440; Ali v. Gonzales, 440 F.3d 678, 681 n. 4 (5th Cir. 2006); 8 U.S.C. §§ 1303, 1305; see also Registration of Certain Nonimmigrant Aliens from Designated Countries, 67 Fed.Reg. 77,642 (Dec. 18, 2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.