Mian Ihsan Ullah petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) November 1, 2005, order adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision finding him removable and denying a continuance pending the adjudication of his labor certification application. Ullah argues that the denial of a continuance violated his rights under the Legal Immigration Family Equity (LIFE) Act, 1 principles of equal protection, and the Due Process Clause. He further argues that the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) violates the Equal Protection Clause.

We find neither an abuse of discretion nor a due process violation in connection with the denial of a continuance pending resolution of Ullah’s application for labor certification. Ahmed v. Gonzales, 447 *196 F.3d 433, 438-39 (5th Cir. 2006); Ali v. Gonzales, 440 F.3d 678, 680-81 (5th Cir. 2006). Ullah’s constitutional challenge to the NSEERS is similarly without merit. Ali, 440 F.3d at 680-82.

The petition for review is DENIED.