United States v. Orona-Galindo
United States v. Orona-Galindo
205 F. App'x 286
United States v. Orona-Galindo
Opinion
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jaime Orona-Galindo raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Caicedo-Cuero, 312 F.3d 697, 707 (5th Cir. 2002), which held that a Texas jail felony conviction for simple possession of marijuana was an “aggravated felony” under § 2L1.2 of the Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.