United States v. Washington
United States v. Washington
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT November 17, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-30737 Clerk Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TIMOTHY TERRANCE WASHINGTON, also known as Big Tim, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:04-CR-10003-1 -------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Timothy Terrance Washington has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and Washington’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, the APPEAL IS DISMISSED, and Washington’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.